Whats hide in the snow comes up in springtime

Time heals all wounds they say ... but that's not true.
  This betrayal, to let my brother's killer, is like an open infected wounds ... it gets worse with time.

  So when started cold-case team woke up a little hope that anyone else would look at this case.
  After such a long time so changing relationships between people, and that one does not dare tell before maybe you dare tell me now.

  So I wrote to Cold-case group.
  I told her about the case and that what was lacking was that Ib Johansen admits it was Jorgen they drove to Holmen and that he recognizes him in appearance.

  After a while, I get a phone call from one of the police officers involved in this case, Fresh I remember his name and I recognized him at his voice.

  He says he is calling on the grounds that I contacted Cold-case group.
  He begins by lamenting and retell what happened (as if I would have forgotten it) and all tours.
  He said on numerous occasions "but you can of course it here, you're quite familiar with."
  I refer the call to my point, that after so long again take up the case and try to obtain an identification ... and that the limitation period for Ib Johansen's involvement reached.
  He then tells how difficult Ib Johansen had it (yes there's nothing I been sleepless for). I play sympathetic and fish on.
  I insist that after such a long time is worth taking up the case because it just missing an identification acc. it can be ascertained by the Court of Appeal's remarkable judgment.

  Then he says:
  But now it was so Ib Johansen identified and admitted that it was Jorgen they drove to Park ... but "we" decided that the designation was so "weak" so he could take it back.
  !!!
  I get way too cold.
  What the fuck he says ???
  They have therefore advised him / urged him to take it back !!!

  "We thought it would keep still."
  !!!

  123 petrified
  Fishing on, show nothing, play with, you do not know if you need him fresh in the future, burns nothing.

  I ask what is the hope for this case now?
  Acc. him there would be if something new emerged about the discovery of the murder weapon and came up with any of it.
  ... and an identification is nothing new since it was already made in connection with Ib Johansen told the truth.

  The call is ended and I thank you for that he called.
  I'm shocked.
  What the fuck have they done ???

  It's not the police to determine whether a designation is weak or not, it's up to the right.

  They have not solved the case, but it was Ib Johansen who solved the access them.
  They have urged him to take back the identification of the person they drove to Holmen.
  They have thrown ace, tossed conclusive evidence in the trash ... to "help" the informant, an accomplice ... to get away with protecting the criminal instead of aiding and abetting.

  What is this?
  Misconduct?
  Protecting criminal and destruction of evidence?

  And then ...
  ... it has been burned opportunities to trap the killer in a higher court when it came to deal with evidence and identification has already burned when there is a new task.

  This is thus the two dishes known about when they have access to the preliminary investigation.
  The question the Court of Appeal stated was not a doubt ... you know.
  If there was any doubt, the only explanation for this strange Court of Appeal that it came to be about principles.
  They probably wanted to slap prosecutors / police on his fingers ... so here we must not do.

  It was more important than judging the murderer and give my brother redress !!!

  And now I'm so pissed off that I had to take a break ...