Equality to the law and legal certainty

Legal security
  Benefit of the doubt if there is reasonable doubt.
  Yes.

  Not as some say every reasonable but just a reasonable doubt.
  The concept of reasonable includes not think anyone goes up in smoke, that there is someone like him instead and that these people somehow miss each other down on the Holmen ... or how Court of Appeal Judge Thomas Stahre, Acting Judge of Appeal Gunilla Hansson and the sleeping Juror Lennart His step mean they thought.
  If you have such "reasonable doubt" so I recommend Haldol (medicin against psychosis) ... and foil cap on, just in case.

  One might ask how the judge would be if the roles were the opposite, that it was Jorgen suspected of having shot Hans Olsson with these evidence.

  But the rule of law applies the other way too.
  If I am exposed to a crime, justice and police work for me to investigate, arrest and prosecute the culprit ... no matter who I am.
  Be my vicarious avenger.

  That's the deal for us to be set up on the system.

  There are people who are convicted even though they are innocent. I know two definite cases and more where I do not have it confirmed.
  But there is not anyone who is at risk, but it is people with no criminal in the past that are most at risk.

  A typical example is the Jorgen who was convicted in the District Court for a shooting he did not do.
  Each one yourself can do "overtaking test in the dark" to see for yourself how much you look.

  Another group at a certain elevated risk is the immigrantmen.

  Although these cases do not end up in the press then it to the attention of many people in persons surroundings.
  What happens to people's sense of justice system when they get this experience?
  ... and when they know they probably will not get the same "priority" as victims of other sheep?

  What happens to people's loyalty when they feel unfairly treated?
  It has a tendency to primarily be loyal to "his family" who are in the same situation and that will probably set more on than you think judiciary does.

  I think there are many who are genuinely afraid to testify but I think there are more people who do not want to testify mainly for reasons other than fear though one might say it because it's the easiest ... or not at all.

  It's not fair words, beautiful intentions or manifestations but what you do concretely in action, big, small and subtle as the basis for how people assess their surroundings ... at last.

  If you do not feel that the system set up for you so you do not set up the system ... so simple it tends to be.

  So the consequences are more far-reaching than they at first glance seem to do.
  ... and then it affects everyone.

  Some will not stand ... in silence.
  Others do like this  ..I..